Sol LeWitt programmatically/accidentally made the most simple, refined, and beautiful home evar,
Can you spot it in this housing development?

122 structures, painted wood, each 8 by 8 by 8
inches; base, 182 plywood squares, each 2 by 12 by 12
inches; 131 pen and ink drawings and photographs.
(Installation, SFMOMA)
I saw this exhibition at SFMOMA around 2024, a sublime quiet experience. The artwork is the name: starting with three connected sides of a cube that extend in three directions/dimensions, what are all the possible forms of a cube? But as usual with LeWitt, the realization of the conceptual art is itself aesthetically pleasing: the drawings, the actual existence of the conceptual forms as sculptures laid out in real space, it’s all so good. The way they get more varied with more “limbs” and then simplify as they approach 11 edges (it doesn’t include the final “full” cube) is lovely. It is much bigger than this appears (it was in a huge room), but it isn’t overwhelming.

My favorite is this element, Incomplete Open Cubes 5/9. It outlines a front door and front garden 🏡, what else do you need?😍
I was quickly drawn to it over every other shape in the exhibition.

Here’s a link to an SVG reconstruction of it.
Make me a concept, mmmkay?
I’d love to own a realization of this particular instance, Incomplete Open Cubes 5/9, or commission a replica; 60 cm (24 inches) a side would fit nicely at the top of our staircase. It’s just baked enamel on aluminum, how expensive can it be? Uh-oh, the auctioneer Christie’s sold Incomplete Open Cube 7/14 in 2011 for… $206,500.

True, this is a larger floor-standing sculpture, 42 inches (106.6 cm) on a side. The dozens at SFMOMA were more petite, apparently only 8×8×8 inches. And this has two extra edges, so the smaller one should be 28% off!?
Is there an official fabricator of these? What are the ethics of ripping off the exquisitely thoughtful concept of a dead artist (Sol LeWitt, 1928-2007, RIP).
Incomplete list of Incomplete Open Cubes
Art Gallery of NSW has 5/8, same number of edges (five), but it’s all spiky and overturned stool.

There’s also a book from the original 1974 gallery exhibition at John Weber Gallery, ‘Sol Lewitt “Incomplete Open Cubes”.’ It’s only $500 for a rumpled version.
Links
I’m not the only one struck by the excellence of the idea, execution, and result. Critics and mathematicians love it.
- Great project https://cubes-revisited.art/about/ by Rob Weychert doesn’t restrict itself to connected edges so it has many more variations. In its numbering scheme my favorite is “5/79”
- Nice blog post, “Irrational Thoughts Should be Followed Absolutely and Logically”: Sol LeWitt’s “Variations of Incomplete Open Cubes” (1974)
- Sol LeWitt: Variations of Incomplete Cubes, 1974 mentions Open Cubes Revisited.
- Sculpture of 7/21 , also from Art Gallery of New South Wales
- Someone’s Master of Science paper, “ANALYSIS OF VARIATIONS OF INCOMPLETE OPEN CUBES BY SOL LEWITT”
- Another paper, Is the List of Incomplete Open Cubes Complete?
- An early article about Sol LeWitt, LeWitt in Progress
- The Mathematical Tourist: Incomplete Open Cubes
- “Mind-Bending Shapes,” Scott Kim article in Discover Magazine in his Bogglers
Home
The Earth can be any shape you want it
Any shape at all
Dark and cold or bright and warm
Long or thin or small
But it’s home and all I ever had
And maybe why for me the Earth is flat— “The Flat Earth”, Thomas Dolby (1984)