art: home is Incomplete Open Cubes 5/9

Sol LeWitt programmatically/accidentally made the most simple, refined, and beautiful home evar,

Can you spot it in this housing development?

Sol LeWitt, 1974 122 Variations of Incomplete Open Cubes.
122 structures, painted wood, each 8 by 8 by 8
inches; base, 182 plywood squares, each 2 by 12 by 12
inches; 131 pen and ink drawings and photographs.
(Installation, SFMOMA)

I saw this exhibition at SFMOMA around 2024, a sublime quiet experience. The artwork is the name: starting with three connected sides of a cube that extend in three directions/dimensions, what are all the possible forms of a cube? But as usual with LeWitt, the realization of the conceptual art is itself aesthetically pleasing: the drawings, the actual existence of the conceptual forms as sculptures laid out in real space, it’s all so good. The way they get more varied with more “limbs” and then simplify as they approach 11 edges (it doesn’t include the final “full” cube) is lovely. It is much bigger than this appears (it was in a huge room), but it isn’t overwhelming.

computer SVG reconstruction of Incomplete Open Cubes 5/79 by Xxxx

My favorite is this element, Incomplete Open Cubes 5/9. It outlines a front door and front garden 🏡, what else do you need?😍

I was quickly drawn to it over every other shape in the exhibition.

A museum room at SFMOMA displaying images and sculptures of Sol Le Witt's conceptual artwork showing all the possible forms of "Incomplete Open Cubes", made up of 3 to 11 edges of a cube.
View of installation of my favorite “5/9” among other sculptures and images from Incomplete Open Cubes 1974, redisplayed at SFMOMA

Here’s a link to an SVG reconstruction of it.

Make me a concept, mmmkay?

I’d love to own a realization of this particular instance, Incomplete Open Cubes 5/9, or commission a replica; 60 cm (24 inches) a side would fit nicely at the top of our staircase. It’s just baked enamel on aluminum, how expensive can it be? Uh-oh, the auctioneer Christie’s sold Incomplete Open Cube 7/14 in 2011 for… $206,500.

Two more edges and much bigger for much major money

True, this is a larger floor-standing sculpture, 42 inches (106.6 cm) on a side. The dozens at SFMOMA were more petite, apparently only 8×8×8 inches. And this has two extra edges, so the smaller one should be 28% off!?

Is there an official fabricator of these? What are the ethics of ripping off the exquisitely thoughtful concept of a dead artist (Sol LeWitt, 1928-2007, RIP).

Incomplete list of Incomplete Open Cubes

Art Gallery of NSW has 5/8, same number of edges (five), but it’s all spiky and overturned stool.

There’s also a book from the original 1974 gallery exhibition at John Weber Gallery, ‘Sol Lewitt “Incomplete Open Cubes”.’ It’s only $500 for a rumpled version.

Links

I’m not the only one struck by the excellence of the idea, execution, and result. Critics and mathematicians love it.

Home

The Earth can be any shape you want it
Any shape at all
Dark and cold or bright and warm
Long or thin or small
But it’s home and all I ever had
And maybe why for me the Earth is flat

— “The Flat Earth”, Thomas Dolby (1984)

About skierpage

As you might guess, my site is mine. My Schema.org info is at .
This entry was posted in architecture, art, design. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.